We will discuss non-fatal offences and how the process by
which such offences are dissected. In the UK, the act which primarily deals with
such offences are the OAPA (Offences Against the Person Act 1861). We will
begin with Section 18: Wounding with intent.
Section 18 states “Whosoever shall unlawfully and
maliciously by any means whatsoever wound or cause any grievous bodily harm to
any person, with intent, to do some grievous bodily harm to any person, or with
intent to resist or prevent the lawful apprehension or detainer of any person,
shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable to be
kept in penal servitude for life”.
In this case, the unlawful act is intending to cause
any grievous bodily harm, if the individual is found guilty could spend up to
life in prison. There are two aspects that would be taken into consideration
when deciding such cases. One is the nature of the “wound” and two is the
intent behind the wounding. It is important for one to understand and
appreciate definitions. A lot rest on the definitions of certain word paramount
in establishing the charge. Mcloughlin 1838 defines a wound as a penetration of
dermis and epidermis, the two layers of the skin. Internal ruptures do not
count as a wound.
Grievous bodily harm has received definitions through case
law. In DPP V Smith, the term was substituted for serious harm or injury. I think one can argue that this term leaves
room for relativism to come to the fore. And lastly in determining whether one
is guilty of such a charge, the intent of the defendant should be the
determined. Did the defendant intend to cause grievous harm to the victim? If the
facts prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that when, an individual took a knife
and slashed the face of the victim, he did it with the intention to cause the
victim to bleed and cause the break the continuity of the skin of the
individual, then it is possible for him to be indicted and charged. However if
the defendant was trying to chase a really poisonous insect from the face of
the victim, and in realizing that his hand was too short and would not give him
sufficient leverage to chase the insect, he decided to use the knife and in
shock of the defendants rapid use of the knife the victim turned his face
resulting in a slash to the face if those facts could be proven, the defendant
will not be charged under section 18 because the intention to cause grievous
bodily harm does not exist.
Hello, Robert. I posted a notice about your new blog at Legal Yankee at www.legalyankee.com. Thanks for sharing you input. I have found that writing about my courses is a good way to learn it all. All the best!
ReplyDeleteHey Thanks!! I really appreciate it. I will keep posting. Hope you keep enjoying!!
Delete