Tuesday 23 June 2015

Is NIC really “beneficial” to St Lucians? Weighing the evidence.

I decided recently to research some of the pertinent legislation of St Lucia, as part of my “coming to know” exercise. I wanted to write about laws that affect the daily lives of the St Lucian Public. In this article I will be reviewing some sections of the National Insurance Corporation Act. It is amazing the things you learn when you do a little bit of reading. Some of you may already be familiar with this information, however for the benefit of us who may still be ignorant of a few things I will share my opinion on section 56- Survivors pension and Grant of The NIC Act.
Section 56 (1) A person who has been widowed is entitled to a survivor’s pension at the prescribed rate if—
 (a) the late spouse satisfied the prescribed contribution conditions for a survivor’s pension; or was at the time of his or her death, in receipt of a pension under this Act;
(b) he or she was married to his or her late spouse for at least 3 years prior to his of her death;
(c) he or she was, at the time of the spouse’s death over the age of 55; or
(d) he or she was under the age of 55 and had the care of his or her children (with his or her late spouse) under the age of 16 or 18 if the children are in receipt of a full-time education.
So the important things that married couples of individuals who are contributors must take note of is that if you are married less than 3 years to a contributor you will not be entitled to survivors benefit. If you are not above 55 at the time of his/her death you are not entitled to receive any benefits. Now how unfair is that!!! Shouldn’t you receive such benefits any time your spouse dies? Let’s dissect this a little more. NIC is sitting on a massive fortune. If you were to investigate the net worth of the NIC and the profits it generates you would be surprised. According to the 2009 annual report (wish they provided a more updated report on their website) the total assets owned is in the tune of $1.35 BILLION dollars. They also have holdings in subsidiary companies namely; NIPRO, Castries Car Park, Blue Coral, St Lucia Mortgage Finance Company. In 2009 The NIC received over $87 million in annual income/contributions of which only a little over 46 million was paid out in short and Long term benefits. According to their annual report of 2009, NIC was profiting over 25 million dollars. After adding their "other income" to the mix they were operating at a profit of 94 million dollars. How much of that money is the hard working St Lucian Public getting in return?
The Castries Car Park is 100% owned by NIC. In 2009, they recorded an average occupancy of 55%. In other words on average only a little over half of the car park was full on any given day. Now I’m sure the NIC would have love a greater rate of occupancy, but it begs the question. Why aren’t more people using the carpark? If I was a conspiracy theorist I would make this absurd proposition for consideration. Are you aware that in “public opinion” Conway was considered one of the most dangerous communities at one point? Are you also aware, that NIC purchased millions of dollars in government bonds? And that NIC’s partnership is highly beneficial to both the GOSL and NIC? Back to my conspiracy theory. If Conway was considered dangerous by the public, and the public consequently were not utilizing the facility. Could it have been NIC who lobbied for the government to displace the Conway residents? Hmmmmmm???? Again I’m not a conspiracy theorist so I won’t make that “silly” assumption. Is this really beneficial to you? I guess you’ll decide. There are more observations I made while analyzing the benefit of NIC, but I don’t want to make the article exorbitantly lengthy, so look out for the next article which I will be posting in a few days.
Here’s to happy reading!!!!